INNOVATION

Building a low TCO eCommerce platform for Lions Fashion Group

Lions Fashion Group (LFG) operates multiple fashion brands, each with its own identity, audience, and growth ambition. Scaling those brands independently would increase development cost, operational overhead, and long-term maintenance. Flatline Agency partnered with Lions Fashion Group to design a low TCO eCommerce infrastructure built on Shopify Plus. Instead of creating separate platforms for Malelions,...

Last updated: 12 Jan 2026

CONTENTS

Lions Fashion Group (LFG) operates multiple fashion brands, each with its own identity, audience, and growth ambition. Scaling those brands independently would increase development cost, operational overhead, and long-term maintenance.

Flatline Agency partnered with Lions Fashion Group to design a low TCO eCommerce infrastructure built on Shopify Plus. Instead of creating separate platforms for Malelions, CROYEZ, and Duquezzi, we developed a shared, scalable foundation with one starter theme, a unified codebase, and brand-specific configurations.

The result: one shared Shopify Plus foundation powering multiple brands, delivering consistent conversion performance and long-term cost efficiency.

In this case study, we break down how the architecture was designed, which tools were used, and why this system supports profitable growth without increasing complexity.

Understanding the challenge: Scaling multiple brands

Lions Fashion Group operates multiple fashion brands, each with its own identity, audience, and growth strategy. While this brand autonomy is essential, scaling each store independently would have introduced structural inefficiencies over time.

Building and maintaining separate eCommerce platforms for every brand would have led to predictable problems:

  • Duplicated development work
  • Fragmented systems and tooling
  • Rising maintenance and operational cost
  • Slower releases over time


The challenge was not growth itself, but how to scale without increasing complexity.

Treating every store as a standalone project would have slowed iteration, increased technical debt, and made long-term maintenance harder to control. Flexibility at the brand level was required, but the underlying platform needed to remain stable, predictable, and easy to maintain.

A systems-level problem

Flatline reframed this as a systems challenge, not a store-by-store build. The goal was to design a shared foundation that could support multiple brands while keeping total cost of ownership predictable.

By avoiding overengineering and focusing on reuse from the start, the platform could scale without fragmenting tooling or multiplying operational effort. This approach reflects how Flatline designs scalable eCommerce platforms for brands that need to grow without accumulating technical debt.

Our approach: Building once, scaling across brands

Flatline approached the build with one guiding principle: centralise what should be shared and configure what needs to be unique. Instead of developing three separate webshops, the team designed a single foundation that could scale across brands without repeating work.

Core components and workflows were shared by default. Brand-specific differences were handled through configuration, not custom development. This allowed Malelions, CROYEZ, and Duquezzi to operate independently at the front end, while relying on the same underlying system.

In practice, this meant:

  • One shared codebase for core functionality
  • Reusable components applied across brands
  • Brand-specific customisation handled at configuration level
  • No duplicated development per store

Because the system is built once and reused, improvements to UX, performance, or conversion-focused elements can be deployed across all brands at the same time. New launches build on an existing foundation instead of starting from scratch.

This system-driven way of working is central to how Flatline approaches scalable eCommerce development. It keeps releases predictable, maintenance centralised, and growth manageable as the portfolio expands.

Designing for conversion at scale

Low TCO eCommerce only works if performance scales alongside efficiency. For Lions Fashion Group, conversion was treated as a structural decision, not a post-launch optimisation.

From the start, Flatline designed the platform around consistent UX patterns and performance-first templates. Instead of optimising each store in isolation, conversion-critical elements were shared across brands. This made it possible to apply learnings once and reuse them everywhere.

Structural conversion principles

  • Shared UX patterns across storefronts
  • Clear information hierarchy on product and category pages
  • Consistent calls-to-action
  • Performance-first templates across devices

This approach enabled the group to work towards a consistent 4%+ conversion rate across brands. Improvements were measured on impact rather than preference, ensuring that optimisation efforts contributed directly to revenue without increasing operational effort.

Flatline’s approach to conversion is closely tied to its conversion rate optimization practice, where CRO is embedded into the platform rather than treated as a series of experiments.

The result is conversion performance that compounds over time. As traffic grows, the system continues to convert efficiently without requiring additional tooling or manual optimisation per brand.

The technical architecture behind a low TCO eCommerce setup

When Lions Fashion Group decided to scale multiple fashion brands, building separate systems per store was not an option. The platform needed to scale without increasing maintenance effort.

Flatline designed the setup as one shared system on Shopify Plus, using a single starter theme and configuration-driven architecture. Malelions and CROYEZ run on the same core theme, while Duquezz i follows the same logic through a template-based setup.

Each brand maintains its own identity, while conversion-critical components are built once and reused across the group.

This structure makes scaling predictable:

  • UX and conversion improvements apply across all brands
  • New features launch faster without duplicated work
  • Maintenance stays centralised instead of fragmented

On top of Shopify, Flatline integrated a lean, native tool stack:

  • Klaviyo for email and SMS automation, connected directly to customer and order data
  • Yotpo for reviews and social proof, supporting trust and conversion across storefronts
  • Returnista for returns management, reducing operational overhead

Each tool connects directly to Shopify, without custom middleware, keeping the setup lean and easy to evolve.

Because all brands share the same foundation, analytics and performance tracking are consistent by default. Data, CRO insights, and marketing learnings can be reused across brands instead of starting from zero each time.

The result is a platform that scales without friction. By clearly separating shared systems from brand-specific layers, Lions Fashion Group can grow while keeping operations predictable.

In this video, Flatline explains how low TCO architecture, conversion-first design, and shared systems come together to support long-term, profitable growth across multiple brands.

Results that compound over time

The impact of the shared architecture became visible quickly. Instead of managing three separate platforms, Lions Fashion Group now operates multiple brands on a single, scalable foundation.

Key outcomes:

  • Consistent 4%+ conversion rates across brands
  • Faster releases without additional development overhead
  • One central system instead of fragmented tooling
  • Easier onboarding of new brands and collections

Because improvements are applied at system level, results compound over time. As traffic and brand portfolios grow, performance and efficiency scale together, without increasing complexity or operational cost.

Building scalable fashion eCommerce with low TCO

Scaling a fashion portfolio does not require more platforms or custom tooling. It requires a low TCO eCommerce architecture designed for reuse, performance, and operational clarity.

This case study shows how a shared Shopify Plus foundation enabled Lions Fashion Group to scale multiple brands without duplicating development effort or increasing technical overhead. By centralising core systems and keeping brand differentiation configurable, the platform remains predictable as complexity grows.

If you are managing multiple fashion brands or preparing for international expansion, Flatline designs scalable Shopify Plus eCommerce platforms built for long-term efficiency, conversion, and growth.

Talk to Flatline about building a low TCO eCommerce setup that scales with your brand portfolio.

THINKING

How to calculate the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for your eCommerce store

Running a successful eCommerce business requires more than just a great product and marketing strategy. Understanding the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is crucial for making informed decisions about your platform, tools, and long-term scalability. Whether you’re on Shopify, Magento, or another platform, calculating your TCO can help you uncover hidden costs and optimize your...

Magento to Shopify Plus Migration_ Cost, Timeline and What Must Be Rebuilt

Magento to Shopify Plus Migration: Cost, Timeline and What Must Be Rebuilt

A Magento to Shopify Plus migration rarely becomes difficult because product rows refuse to import. The complexity sits in everything the Magento estate has learned to do over time: product relationships, pricing rules, extensions, regional store views, B2B workflows and connections to systems that still need to work after launch. Migrating from Magento or Adobe...

Centra to Shopify Plus Migration Cost, Timeline and the Fashion Workflows You Need to Preserve

Centra to Shopify Plus Migration: Cost, Timeline and the Fashion Workflows You Need to Preserve

A Centra to Shopify Plus migration means rebuilding your commerce operation around a different product, storefront and order model. For fashion brands, the deciding questions are whether Shopify can preserve style and size identity, wholesale commitments and market-specific selling rules while reducing the work required to run and improve the store. The difficult part may...

SAP Commerce Cloud (Hybris) to Shopify Plus_ Cost, Timeline and What Stays in SAP

SAP Commerce Cloud (Hybris) to Shopify Plus Migration: Cost, Timeline and What Stays in SAP

Your commerce team wants faster releases. Finance wants to keep SAP. Operations wants proof that contract prices, credit checks and warehouse orders will still work. Those requirements are compatible, but only if the migration separates the storefront from the business processes behind it. A SAP Commerce Cloud to Shopify Plus migration replaces the commerce platform,...

PrestaShop to Shopify Migration_ Cost, Timeline and What Must Be Rebuilt

PrestaShop to Shopify Migration: Cost, Timeline and What Must Be Rebuilt

A PrestaShop export can make migration look like a data-transfer exercise. The visible records are only part of the job. Commercial behavior may also sit in combinations, features, specific prices, customer groups, cart rules, modules, overrides, multistore settings and connections to the rest of the operation. A PrestaShop to Shopify migration moves the records the...

Salesforce Commerce Cloud to Shopify Plus Migration_ Cost, Timeline and How to Unbundle the Stack

Salesforce Commerce Cloud to Shopify Plus Migration: Cost, Timeline and How to Unbundle the Stack

A Salesforce Commerce Cloud to Shopify Plus migration is rarely contained within the storefront. Commerce data may be connected to Marketing Cloud, Service Cloud, Order Management, Data Cloud, middleware and custom cartridges. Changing the commerce core therefore means deciding which parts of that ecosystem should remain, reconnect, move or disappear. Migrating from Salesforce Commerce Cloud...

BigCommerce to Shopify Plus Migration_ Cost, Timeline and the Parity Plan

BigCommerce to Shopify Plus Migration: Cost, Timeline and the Parity Plan

A BigCommerce to Shopify Plus migration can look straightforward because both platforms are managed SaaS products. That similarity is deceptive. Products and customers may be exportable, but product modifiers, channel assignments, customer-group pricing, B2B companies, checkout rules and integration contracts do not automatically retain their meaning. A BigCommerce to Shopify Plus migration should transfer valid...

WooCommerce to Shopify Migration_ Costs, Timeline and What Your Plugins Leave Behind

WooCommerce to Shopify Migration: Costs, Timeline and What Your Plugins Leave Behind

Your product export is ready. The harder decisions are still inside a subscription plugin, a custom checkout field and the WordPress pages that bring buyers into the store. A WooCommerce to Shopify migration is the transfer of commerce data and customer journeys into Shopify, alongside rebuilding the storefront and replacing WordPress-dependent functionality. A complete migration...

Shopware to Shopify Plus Migration_ Cost, Timeline and What Must Be Remapped

Shopware to Shopify Plus Migration: Cost, Timeline and What Must Be Remapped

The visible part of a Shopware to Shopify Plus migration is a new storefront. The difficult part sits underneath it: inherited product relationships, Rule Builder conditions, Shopping Experiences, sales-channel configuration, plugins, B2B workflows and connections to the systems that run the wider operation. A Shopware to Shopify Plus migration transfers the commerce data the business...

High add-to-cart, low checkout completion_ reading the drop-off between intent and purchase

High add-to-cart, low checkout completion: reading the drop-off between intent and purchase

High add-to-cart with low checkout completion is not a sign of indecision. A high add-to-cart rate is itself evidence of intent, because people do not fill a cart they do not want, so a cart that never checks out is friction with a location rather than a shopper who changed their mind. The gap between...

Blended CAC Is Lying to You_ The DTC Numbers That Decide Whether Growth Is Profitable

Blended CAC Is Lying to You: The DTC Numbers That Decide Whether Growth Is Profitable

The acquisition number on your dashboard is probably making your spend look healthier than it is. Blended customer acquisition cost divides all your ad spend by all the customers you got, and the customers you got include returning buyers you did not pay to acquire. Those free orders sit in the math and quietly subsidise...